Quantcast
Channel: otoliths
Viewing all 5242 articles
Browse latest View live

Article 3

$
0
0
Lakey Comess


Come in, slow and quiet


I like your strategy. It's hot.

Call on the tactical teams. Kick the door closed.
Track down years, miles, missing minutes.

They say you really have lost your powers.
You know, if the shape fits...

That's four thousand square feet,
incongruously shrouded with prefab ideas, leftovers, sterile.

Detracts from the columns. Carpets need cleaning.
Does this mean anything?

Forms of address are important.
So, we will avoid personal transmission.

I'll be in touch. You call me first. It's safe.
I almost never pick up.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp 17/02/2012



Fat mogul

Your work suffers
(one result of his snooping proximity),

plot invented by sticky kingpin,
fat on dreams of vulnerable quarry.

Clay lengthens into a face as long as a broken violin.
Arms grow like tentacles.

Eyebrows vamp Mephistopheles,
Don Juan in hellish, grasping interference.

ARE YOU SUFFERING FROM STOCKHOLM SYNDROME of ghastly dimensions?

Now take paralysis out for a walk.

Here is a bowl of anodized bronze roses,
boy wearing towel, poetic fulcrum.

Here, too, window shades are torn off windows.
All the better to see cynical parade pass by.

Celebrate the ending of a week-long festival of nihilism
by breaking bottles blocking your way.

You have to carry your luggage like battering ram,
barge through the crowd.

Home is where shelter sprouts lacey green fronds.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp 25/07/2010



Fair dinkum doxology

Something written compounded with reckoning.
Sense all around you, cloaked in explicable seasons…

Sense you, inexplicable,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  all around, cloaked,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in seasons, reckoning.

Discomfort shapes terms.

The vagrant,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  tacking return
to the faintest
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  idea, gives breath
to a rainbow.

Oh, we would like to believe in the phantom cavalier.
Attitude that on the topical sonata of the day.

Troops successfully import outcry and presentation,
meet in saintly absolution,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  chart death,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  low points to a higher history.

Memorable manners, the ruinous rises up.
The serpent malice and so forth…

Differences between creed in fair dinkum and doxology.
Lands, teinds, secure as foundations, suspended animation.

Acronyms will be revealed shortly.
Rugged terrain interjects,
completes the remains of debriefing.

Midst of a detailed document. Threads on the warpath.

Writing so similar in components of wide circles, habitually marvelling at incidence.
Writing so similar in circles, incidence of wide components, marvelling habitually.
Deep conversations over the cobblestones. Helter skelter, a whole house of cards.

Intimacy acquaints itself with restoration, searching for additions.

Nil-seven and the hangman's smile.

Think of eternity and heartily preserve the comments.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp 09/05/03




Lakey Comess, born U S A in 1948, has lived in Israel, South Africa and the Orkney Islands in Scotland and now lives in Glasgow. She has contributed to Versal, Big Bridge, Sidereality, Shampoo, Gulf Stream, Milk, Hutt, Otoliths, Hamilton Stone Review, Mad Hatters' Review blog, On Barcelona blog and other publications, also as Lakey Teasdale.

Article 2

Article 6

$
0
0
Kenneth Rexroth



Three Columns from the San Francisco Examiner of 1962

Poetry and Song, French and American

Sitting down to write this column, I am a little tired because I have been busy for the last few hours putting together a show for the San Francisco Poetry Festival coming up June 21. I think we’ve got it shaped up. I hope so, because it is a scheme dear to my heart.

As everybody knows, the great trouble with American poetry is that almost nobody reads it. In recent years a movement for the oral presentation of poetry has spread from San Francisco over the country. Any poet of any reputation at all with sufficient stamina could now make a good living on the college poetry reading circuit. The schools have discovered that it is one of the most popular, as it certainly is the cheapest, assembly programs they can get.

This is all to the good, but still it is a limited and specialized audience. After school is over and the kids have gone out into the world, there surely isn’t much poetry lying around.

A few years back Kenneth Patchen, Lawrence Ferlinghetti and I revived the reading of poetry to jazz. It was very popular, and very successful. In no time at all we found ourselves in the big time of the entertainment business, seriously considered as a brand new gig in the pages of Variety. And then the Beats pulled the rug out from under us. Soon every Greenwich Village and North Beach bistro had a barefoot bearded boy reading free verse doggerel to a pawnshop saxophone. That was the end of that.

There is another way of doing it, though. The average person who listens to Edith Piaf, Juliette Greco, or Germaine Montero does not realize that the majority of the numbers on most of their records are by very well known poets indeed.

In the middle of the last century the French poet Charles Cros (who incidentally invented the phonograph) was himself a café chantant entertainer. Yvette Guilbert made Ronsard’s sonnet “When you are old and seated by the fire” a popular song. Aristide Bruant, whose café was immortalized by Toulouse Lautrec, wrote a whole batch of songs that are possibly the greatest poems of low life ever written. Germaine Montero sings them on an Angel Record. Brassens, the lyric social satirist, one of the most popular entertainers in France, is an excellent poet. No contemporary satirical poetry in English can remotely compare with his.

Not only do the singers write poetry, really poetry, for their lyrics. The leading poets of France are sung in cafés chantants and night clubs. Apollinaire, Eluard, Prévert, Queneau, Cocteau, Desnos, Jacob, Cendrars, Aragon, Mac Orlan, Carco — the leading poets of the last generation — I have heard them all sung in clubs to typical melodies of the café idiom.

The younger people are carrying on the tradition even more vigorously. One of the most enjoyable records I have is the harpist and singer Douai singing songs by the editor of Poésie, Pierre Seghers.

If we could only get something like this started in America maybe we would have a breakthrough into a vitally interested adult audience. There is no point in putting down the environment as beneath the dignity of poetry. What is wrong with American poetry is that almost everything imaginable is beneath its dignity. Homer and the troubadours sang for audiences not a whit different. The medieval Goliards were out and out barflies.

It’s the other way around. The problem is to find poems by American poets that say something to people who are not literary specialists. Sex, candy and bloodshed, the subjects that interest the widest audiences, interest few poets, or it they do they keep quiet about it. Most contemporary poets write complicated poems about how hard they find it to count their thumbs.

Anyway, I have gathered up some typical café songs by major French poets, and got a jazz musician to write some “club tunes” to some modern American love poems, and got a pretty and melodious girl to sing them. It should be a gas, and best of all it should be foolproof. You have to have some sort of skill all along the way and I don’t see how it can be invaded and destroyed by the human airedales.

If it goes over, maybe we can move it to the Eye or the Onion and after that who knows, maybe we’ll have started a sounder and more enduring craze than the late lamented “poetry and jazz.”

[April 1, 1962]




Religion and the Enhancement of Life

During most of last week I was conducting a seminar at Big Sur Hot Springs on “Religious Restatement in an Age of Faithlessness.” A subject to which we found ourselves returning again and again was the role religion plays in the enhancement of life. Perhaps this is its primary role, if we confine ourselves to people’s behavior rather than to their beliefs about why they behave, religiously, the way they do.

Certainly all religions, even atheistic ones like Buddhism, deal with the ultimate significance of life. So does philosophy. But religion embodies significance in acts, in responses of the whole man. Philosophy reduces significance to notions. So the total response of religion transfigures life in a way philosophy does not.

The arts do this too, but in a different way. They adorn life, but they do not demand commitment. Bach or Cézanne, you can take them or leave them alone.

One of the things we are always being told is that in our modern secular society, this enhancement of life is withering away. Discussing this question during five days of intense conversation, I think some of us began to wonder if this were in fact true.

Because Christianity arose in a period of disillusionment, alienation, life tedium, “failure of nerve,” so many religious apologists seem to believe that if they can just convince us that we are living in the same kind of time, we will all join up.

There is no question but that we are living in a period of widespread social disorder. There are groups and tendencies in society headed all too obviously toward disaster. There are millions of people who are hopeless, frustrated, frightened. It seems to me there is a difference. We know it. This is a highly self-conscious age and its very self-consciousness is a powerful corrective.

I once shocked Vance Packard severely by pointing out to him over lunch that he was himself a hygienic device of the Madison Avenue he has devoted himself to exposing.

Similarly, religious leaders like Niebuhr, Tillich, Maritain, Dawson, Buber, Berdyaev are not broadcasting to us from another planet. They are themselves highly articulate members of the same society where nerves are failing and lives are tedious. They are all demanding that we might have life, that we might have it more abundantly.

Such a demand is meaningless if it is not widely accessible. Then it is not a demand, but a pious hope.

Before you can enhance life, you’ve got to have it, at least in considerable measure. Today in America and Europe, in the very society that is supposed to be disintegrating, men are well enough, well educated enough, and possess enough leisure to begin to ask the important questions in very large numbers indeed.

I doubt if they were any better off in the “Thirteenth, Greatest of Centuries.” Then, too, we are self-critical enough to seek for the sharpest questions.

On her deathbed, Gertrude Stein asked, “What is the answer?” Nobody replied. After a bit, she said, “What is the question?” and so died.

[April 4, 1962]




The Atomic Arms Race

By the time this column gets into print the first bomb may have exploded above that island named for the night on which angels appeared in the air singing, “Peace on earth, good will to men.” Let me say at the beginning that I agree completely with Linus Pauling and Bertrand Russell in their charges that we are victimizing unborn generations with the genetic effects of radioactive fallout and that we are headed straight towards a war of complete extermination of the human race. Who denies this?

I have nothing but contempt for those who assure us that an atomic war is not going to hurt, much, and that atomic warfare does not differ in the moral issues it raises from any other kind of warfare in the past.

Neither President Kennedy nor Chairman Khrushchev agree with the school of thought represented in the public mind with Edward Teller. Both of them agree with me — or with Linus Pauling or Bertrand Russell. At least they have said so enough times. Presumably they are the two best informed men on the subject and know what they are talking about.

Yet, barring a miracle, both sides will resume atmospheric testing this summer, and will continue it indefinitely.

All mankind is caught up in the overwhelming inertia of power politics. Nobody can break away — at least nobody in power. Even at its best, politics is not a moral art. It is the art of the expedient. This may be sufficient when politics is concerned with the location of freeways or even, give time, with the extension of the franchise in Alabama.

The issue of atomic warfare poses the ultimate problem, the problem that mankind has never been able to solve. Today it is stated as simply and starkly as possible. Either the human race learns, and that quickly, to moralize politics or the species will cease to exist in the not too distant future.

A power struggle which can only end in the mutual extermination of the combatants and of all the bystanders as well is the final expression of the politics of despair.

President Kennedy has said that we can look forward to 30 more years of the Cold War, the arms race, and power maneuvering in the former colonial world. And then what? What lies at the end of this? A kind of radioactive decay of the human conscience? What is the answer?

I believe that at present the only possible answer open to the individual is precisely individual. Demonstrations in Trafalgar Square and Times Square are not going to stop this avalanche towards death, and for one very simple reason — there are no comparable demonstrations in the Red Square and on the Nevsky Prospekt.

All that we can do is to so act as individuals that we, within the tiny limits of our individual power, keep the moral issues alive and constantly before the eyes of those to whom the power of decision has been delegated.

If we are men of peace we can point to the possibility of a world at peace. Against despair we can raise hope. Our hope can have meaning and content for all men as despair cannot at all.

It is that or nothing. Nothing at all.

[April 25, 1962]



 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 5

$
0
0
Kenneth Rexroth



Three More Columns from the San Francisco Examiner of 1962
The Persistence of Pseudoscience

Off to Aspen to take part in a seminar on “The Public Understanding of the Role of Science in Society.”

Meanwhile, another man has gone around the world in a great hurry, the Federal Radiation Council has issued a report characterized by ingenious ambiguity, and the Blue Chips — meaning in many instances public investment in the commercial exploitation of new scientific developments — have led the market way, way down, and then way back up again, and now are oscillating nervously.

Here are three recent and dramatic instances in which science impinges on the interests of the ordinary man. What does he understand about them, scientifically speaking? If by ordinary, you mean really, honest-to-goodness ordinary, the answer is — nothing.

For the vast bulk of the population, of however many years of schooling, the terms and procedures of science are as awe-inspiring and as incomprehensible as the dances and spells of a witch doctor, and the end of science is still magic, the coercion of fate by mystery.

My earliest memory of the public image of the scientist is the man in the white cost who used to subject a popular brand of canned beans to rigorous scrutiny in a test tube while a white coated colleague, his face alight with the glow that shone from Watt’s tea kettle, transcribed his discoveries in a notebook.

They are still doing it, but now beans seem to sell themselves and they’ve gone to work on deodorants, cigarette filters and lipstick. Otherwise, the public is acutely aware that a group of Bela Lugosis and Boris Karloffs were locked up inside a cyclone fence in the New Mexico mountains and cooked up something that blew up a couple of Japanese cities and now threatens to blow up the planet. Beyond this meager image lies only a vast, dim, frightening confusion.

You think I am kidding? One of California’s best educated candidates for Governor [Upton Sinclair] was a passionate supporter of the Abrams Electronic Diagnosis Machine. Another writer [Paul Goodman], perhaps the most trenchant social critic of my generation, and an excellent poet, dramatist and short story writer as well, is to this day a devout believer in the Orgone Therapy of the late Wilhelm Reich. Movie producers, major stock market investors, industrialists, as well as the Sage of Big Sur [Henry Miller], plan their daily activities with the aid of pulp magazines of astrology.

These are all educated men, some of them even learned, yet any Boy Scout who had passed his Science Merit Badge could expose their utter ignorance of the simplest scientific facts.

In the common meaning of the term, this is the Public. Far worse than their ignorance of matters of fact is their misconception of the nature of science. Most people, even in the civilized nations, still live in a prescientific age.

Abrams Machine, Orgone Box, astrology, cancer cures, trick diets, fake medicine, dianetics, cybernetics, pseudo-psychiatry, tiger’s milk, or the lost continents of Mu and Atlantis — in every case we are dealing with the manipulation of reality on the basis of unsupportable hypotheses for the purpose of easing the minds of the insecure. This is precisely what the Arunta in the Australian Desert do when they chop holes in themselves, fill the gashes with emu feathers and point sharpened sticks in the direction of their enemies’ village.

This is why the public will give its enthusiastic support to expensive and spectacular toys like space rockets and view with indifference the impending revolutionary breakthrough in the cheap desalting of seawater.
Space gadgets are reassuring precisely because they are spectacular and expensive. There is nothing spectacular about a glass of water, while an astronaut around the earth is as great a solace as a bag of asafetida around the neck. When the Russians had two beeping balls and a dog aloft at once, the country was beside itself. We’d been out-magicked. Our shamen, on whom we’d spent all that money, had failed us.

I wonder if the hundreds of scientists who have taken part in the last few years in just such symposia as I am going to, realize what thin ice they are skating on? It is true that we need improvement in the science education offered by our schools; we need to close the gap between Sir Charles Snow’s “two cultures,” between the scientist and the humanist; we need to preserve the integrity of science in the face of the demands of Big Business and Big War; we need to cherish and nourish the informed lay public that does exist; we need to spend more money on research and less on “development” — that is, gaudy hardware; we need to rout the comic and/or subversive image of the egghead and the highbrow from popular mythology, and so on and on.

But these are all concerns of an elite, the scientists themselves and the genuinely informed laity. Both these groups live in and on the wider public. As long as this circumambient public is, scientifically speaking, living intellectually in the Stone Age, the scientists and their own small “public” are going to be as ill at ease as salt water fish who have been forced to adapt to life in fresh water.

[June 10, 1962]




American Poetry Since 1940

Off to the University of Oregon to give a series of lectures. I am beginning to feel this summer a bit like Eleanor [Roosevelt] in her prime, or even like Stephen Spender. I remember a letter from Dylan Thomas shortly before his death that went something like this: “I am at a Writers’ Conference in Prague. It’s not that I have any special sympathy with the government, but it’s the only one in the world I could find that wasn’t being attended by Stephen Spender.”

After I’d signed up for the series of talks they handed me a subject: American Poetry Since 1940. You guessed right — this took me considerably aback and my immediate reaction was — “Don’t mention it.” Is American poetry since 1940 really worth talking about for an hour a day for two weeks?

The ancient Chinese Buddhist poem says:

The fish in the waterfall
Cannot see himself,
And has no hands to touch himself,
And so can never know
What kind of creature he is.


Immersed in life we have almost no perspective; those who are immersed in the practice of an art have less than none. However an assignment like my present one has caused me to cast about and try to see where I am. After all, my primary life commitment after my family is to the integrity of my own craft of poetry.

What has my generation and the one after it accomplished? How do we stack up against the great dead, or against the classic generation of American modernists, T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, Wallace Stevens, Marianne Moore, E.E. Cummings and the rest of them? How do we compare with the Proletarians of the 30’s or the self-styled Reactionary Generation that came after them?

Long ago, standing in the Sistine Chapel and looking at the clamorous rhetoric of Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, there stole into my mind a thought: “You know, Kenneth, art is by and large a failure.”

Possibly I have listened to too much music, read too many books, seen too many pictures, but past middle life, I seem to be predisposed always to weigh the achievement against the promise and wonder.

Recently, teaching a class in 19th and 20th century French painting, I was appalled to discover that my favorite painter was Pissarro, and before him, Chardin. Their aims were modest, but they accomplished them, completely. As Tennyson says in Locksley Hall, “Better 20 minutes of Puccini than a cycle of Wagner.”*

When we think of the vaunting programs of the Movements and Revolutions in poetry since Baudelaire, contemporary American poetry seems very modest indeed. The surrealist André Breton used to talk about how surrealist poetry would “fundamentally reorganize the human spirit as such.” It didn’t. My contemporaries and successors don’t seem to have any programs at all, not in that sense; they just write poetry.

I guess it is this unprogrammatic attitude to life and art that social critics are talking about when they refer to “Post-Modern Man.” We have outlived the Communist Manifesto and the Imagist Manifesto as well.

The Proletarians of the 30’s used to talk about going to the masses. They never got further than the literary cafeterias of Greenwich Village and the disorderly desks of the WPA Writers’ Project. Today with necks and brains well scrubbed, a surprising number of them occupy the top executive desks along Madison Avenue.

The Reactionaries talked about creating Mythic Archetypes for Conservative Man. Honest, they really did. Well, my columnar colleague Barry Goldwater may have his faults, but one of them is not the stylistic influence of T.S. Eliot, Allen Tate and John Crowe Ransom. For that we can be thankful.

The conspicuous thing about contemporary poetry is that it has, without thinking about it, become enormously popular. If I could stand the gaff, I could live on the lecture and reading circuit and make between two and three thousands dollars a month. So could any one of some twenty poets of my age or younger.

Books by Allen Ginsberg and Lawrence Ferlinghetti outsell all but the most popular novels. This is not, as you might think, the scandalous success of the Beatniks. The conservative, conventional poetry of Robert Lowell sells almost as well.

Creative writing classes in every college are now busy turning out a kind of mandarin poet; soon you will not be admitted to the ranks of the professional, technical and administrative intelligentsia unless you have published a slender volume of Neo-Metaphysical verse, just like ancient China.

There is no question but that people are listening. The question is, what are they listening to? As poetry slowly diffuses through the social body like milk through water, what is happening to it? What qualitative changes are taking place? Is it any good?

That is another story. Maybe after I have talked about it for two weeks I will know the answer.

[August 5, 1962]
____
*Archivist's note. Tennyson ’s poem (1842) was far too early to have referred to Puccini and Wagner. Rexroth is doing a wry takeoff of the following lines from it: “Through the shadow of the globe we sweep into the younger day; / Better fifty years of Europe than a cycle of Cathay.”




The Death of Marilyn Monroe

Like everybody else I am still haunted by the death of Marilyn Monroe. I suppose everyone with any sensibility at all heard the first news with a sick qualm at the pit of the stomach. Partly it was the realization of the long foreboding, the doom had been there in the background, dimly visible through the publicity releases for a long time. “It’s happened at last,” we all said. And since she provided millions with an erotic image, how many must have been seized by a little spasm of fantasy, “If only I could have prevented it.” The dream recoiled and involved the dreamer in an instant of imagined responsibility.

We talk about the American Dream. Alright, if Marilyn Monroe was the American Dream, what has gone wrong with it? Lillian Russell didn’t die so, nor Gaby Deslys, nor Sarah Bernhardt, nor Dolly Varden, nor Ida Rubenstein, and Mercedes DaCosta is still alive and recently published her memoirs. Actresses and dancers and singers and great courtesans who have given the public what in dreams they couldn’t find privately have by and large been successful at it. Morgan put his mistress on the silver dollar, and Dolly Varden fish are a nuisance to anglers in all the trout streams of northwest America. I am sure that every time Morgan’s girl spent that silver dollar, her faith in herself was enormously renewed. Perhaps they were priestesses of the Bitch Goddess, but she took care of her votaries. At each contact with her they gained strength, like the demigod who could fight with Hercules as long as he could make contact with his mother, the earth. They didn’t ask too much meaning from existence, and not too much love. The meaning was in the doing, like the birds of the air and the lilies of the field.

Hercules held his opponent over his head until he grew weak and then he strangled him easily. What was the contact this girl couldn’t make? On the face of it, how absurd it seems to talk about her insecurity. True, she was cheated out of the role she most wanted to play, and could have played perfectly — Grushenka in The Brothers Karamazov. The part was given to a cold girl who can only do three things well, walk, walk faster, and run — but a girl who minded. The remarkable thing is that that is the only time the industry ever double-crossed her. In its own immense bumbling way, like River Rouge trying to manufacture Alençon lace, it tried to find things for her to do.

When she really got the chance, she did them very well. She must have known the satisfaction of good work well done. Why wasn’t it enough?

Now Aphrodite was a slippery and adulterous goddess, but she never cried out of the gloom of any of her shrines and said, “I cannot believe in the existence of what I am the goddess of.” The goddess bespeaks the minds of her worshipers. We have the idol we deserve.

The marriages which break up today are so often the ones that, seen from the outside, look ideal. Actresses and physicists at the pinnacle of success commit suicide. The worst beatniks are to be found at the Ivy League colleges, the worst delinquency areas are the two-car garages, three-bathroom suburbs.

Now the extraordinary thing about this state of affairs is that no one at all has anything resembling a convincing explanation. It isn’t materialism. Most Americans still cling to some kind of vague belief in some kind of Deity, and on the other hand, the entire Far East has always been godless in our sense. It is certainly not imaginary entities like Oedipus complexes. If they exist people have always had them.

The society we have invented for ourselves to live in seems to be, like the hydrogen bomb we have invented to exterminate ourselves, too vast a thing for us to comprehend. Somewhere a feedback valve has got connected to the refuse pipe and is pouring poison into the control center — and nobody knows what it is or where it is. At least I don’t. Do you?

[August 19, 1962]




A comprehensive biography of Kenneth Rexroth (1905-1982) can be found at The Poetry Foundation.

(Editor's Note: The complete columns — more than 760 of them — that Kenneth Rexroth wrote for the San Francisco Examiner can be found as a separate section on Ken Knabb's great website, The Bureau of Public Secrets. My thanks to Ken for permission to reprint this selection."
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 4

Article 3

$
0
0
Olivier Schopfer


Geometrical, Part Two



















Olivier Schopfer lives in Geneva, Switzerland. He likes to capture the moment in haiku and photography. His work has appeared in The Red Moon Anthology of English-Language Haiku in 2014 and 2016, as well as in numerous online and print journals from Acorn through to Under the Basho.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 2

$
0
0
Claudia Serea


Signs the end of the world is near (time to move to New Jersey)

Mother and I walk through the woods, and a woman with a twirling umbrella shows up, dressed as a clown from the Zamboni Circus. She’s telling me a message, but I’m distracted by her umbrella and don’t understand. A dog comes by—and it’s my little brother. I recognize his eyes, the way he looks at me. He’s limping, so I carry him home. Giant fires light up the sky. We’re on the highway near my hometown: the hills are burning.

In Times Square, Jesus is eating Pad Thai for lunch, and a bunch of Elmos are joining the armed forces. A recent transplant from the 9th Circle of Hell chats with an old lady in the subway. She can’t hear anything because Spiderman is playing the saxophone. In the tunnel, someone detonates a teapot bomb by accident. Everyone runs, but the sax player.

In Bushwick, the local artist takes her peacock for a walk. The Queen Bee is walking tigers on Broadway on a golden leash. And my neighbor is walking a white dog named Noon and a black one named Midnight. He smokes and stops to pick up after them. He has a cat named Insomnia at home.

At Starbucks, the latte costs 39 bucks. The barista is wearing a Putin T-shirt and a Karl Marx beard. He speaks with a strong Russian accent and writes “Comrade Claudia” on the cup. E.E. Cummings is eating a freedom omelette with freedom fries for breakfast. I pay for the latte and sit at the table with Keats. He’s holding a toy bus in his hand and says, "God bus you."

The walls are covered with portraits of Justin Bieber and Beyoncé. On the black-and-white TV, Wolf Blitzer announces that Beyoncé had just won the presidential elections. One should always ask: At the end of the world, what would Beyoncé do? She’d probably move the White House to New Jersey.



After the elephants, a janitor came out with a garbage can on his back. He spoke in a thick accent and scooped the elephant dung into large plastic bags. When he filled a bag, he tossed it into the air and—rim shot—caught it in his trashcan backpack. Higher and higher, he tossed the bags, catching them each time. The crowd roared. Then, one of the bags caught fire. Then, two, then, three! The janitor was juggling huge flaming bags of elephant shit flying to the top of the tent. The crowd was on its feet. If he dropped a bag in the sawdust, the whole place will go up. But all three bags plopped into his trashcan, extinguishing one by one. The lights went out, and the clown disappeared.



This is the night when the girls wash their faces with dew, and watch how the gates of the world open, and the spirits let them see their future. This is the night when all the animals, insects, and birds can talk, and you can hear them. It’s the night when the sky grove changes, and the sun starts getting smaller. At midnight, summer and winter hang in balance on a knife blade, with all the weather, winds, and stars before summer recedes. In the midnight stalls, winter breeds its stallions.

This is the night to pick miraculous herbs: chicory gives strength; white fern flower makes you lucky all year; maple leaves heal wounds and headaches; maselarita cures toothaches and makes you light, so you can fly on a broom; snakeweed blooms at midnight and disappears the next day, so catch it before it’s gone and use it for a love spell. If you’re brave enough to swallow it, you can touch anyone and read their fate like an open book. And don’t forget verbena and zarna, the love weeds.

At midnight, naked in the moonlight, pick the sanziene flowers and hang them in the window to chase away the ghosts and the undead. Wear them around your waist to make your womb as fertile as summer. Burn them to burn the devil. Braid wreaths and throw them on the roof. This is the night to peer into your future. If the wreaths cling to a tile, you’ll get married this year.




Claudia Serea’s poems and translations have appeared in Field, New Letters, 5 a.m., Meridian, Gravel, Prairie Schooner, and many others. An eight-time Pushcart Prize and four-time Best of the Net nominee, she is the author of Angels & Beasts (Phoenicia Publishing, 2012), A Dirt Road Hangs From the Sky (8th House Publishing, 2013), To Part Is to Die a Little (Cervena Barva Press, 2015) and Nothing Important Happened Today (Broadstone Books, 2016). Serea is a founding editor of National Translation Month, and she co-hosts The Williams Poetry Readings in Rutherford, NJ. Her latest project is Twoxism, a poetry-photography collaboration blog with Maria Haro.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

















Article 3

$
0
0
Carol Stetser


DATA











Carol Stetser was born in 1948 in Syracuse, New York. She studied theater at Smith College and mass communications at Emerson College.

She moved to Arizona in 1974 and founded Padma Press two years later. After publishing three offset photography books, she became active in the Mail Art network. In 1980 she began making xerographic collages, a medium she continues to explore. In 1984 she concentrated on visual poetry and this work has been widely published in print and online publications.

Stetser makes her paper collages the old fashioned way with scissors and glue sticks. Her vispo is published in C'est mon Dada, This is visual Poetry, and the anthologies Writing to be Seen and The Last Vispo Anthology.

She writes of the above pieces: "I have made several series of collages using Muybridge's amazing photographs. His motion studies, as well as various alphabets and computers all provide us with data."
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 2

$
0
0
AG Davis


GOD

i have an artificial limb, there is tension of my mouth, my eyes are often seen so that the circle will appear repeatedly in an infinite rhizomescape,
i will die, i will reanimate as others, and at infinity's return, i will be born yet again – as this ''particular'' prosthesis of the universe ...

as we approach the Singularity, God is brought back to space-time: it is as it always was, and as it always will be: God is both presence and absence, created in the image of man, the limitlessness of God is brought forth by our own creation
again,
and again,
and again,
...



AGOD

– a veiled and drunken doctor
has failed his patient
(it was a very cold morning)
with throats that led the
lecherous priests brokenly
to the reels of chaos,
pointing to the debilitated
causes,
this systemetized
and imperious force
remaining disjointed,
ordering truth against the saved,
commanding the masked
worm's chest to be wetted
atop thick plastic,
each spermatazoa's zone
fraudulent in the heavy mist,
– and of this,
my own synthetic and crippled
viewing expands the victim's
motion towards an uncertain thesis,
– a thesis in which the vacant
judgment is timeless,

– and knowing that the sacred voyeurism
entails veiled angularity for fear
of changeable intentions,
or accidental signals that obey
the mind suddenly thrown asunder
when the sun is blurred,

– we play,

– copulating rhizomatically,

– cognizant that the mind has internalized the sewer of these,
the jet-black filth,
I say,
the filth,
– despite the mired answers of distant imbecilic backgrounds,
the backgrounds of a softer Will within blind stares,

– in this knowledge
we will shoot-off our futures
with a past too empty to tempt ...





AG Davis was born in 1984; heterodox Christian, former pimp, recovering addict, sound poet, author of the hypermodernist novels Bathory and Glass, both published by Abstract Editions in 2016 and 2018, respectively.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 1

$
0
0
Steve Dalachinsky



Worship Elvis


Moving Day 1


Moving Day 2


Moving Day 3


Crocodile Postcard




Poet/collagist Steve Dalachinsky was born in Brooklyn after the last big war and has managed to survive lots of little wars. His book The Final Nite (Ugly Duckling Presse) won the PEN Oakland National Book Award. His most recent books are Fools Gold (2014 feral press), a superintendent's eyes (revised and expanded 2013 - unbearable/ autonomedia), flying home, a collaboration with German visual artist Sig Bang Schmidt (Paris Lit Up Press 2015), The Invisible Ray, with artwork by Shalom Neuman, from Overpass Press, "5-COLOR ASSORTMENT" Chameleon Too from Redfox Press, and FROZEN HEATWAVE with Yuko Otomo, from Luna Bisonte Prods. His latest cd is The Fallout of Dreams with Dave Liebman and Richie Beirach (Roguart 2014). His poem “Particle Fever” was nominated for a 2015 Pushcart Prize.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 2

$
0
0
Jake Berry


Assimilating the Impossible: a review of three new books by Jack Foley
Grief Songs
Sagging Meniscus Press
$15
Grief Songs CD $10

Riverrun
Poetry Hotel Press
$19.95

The Tiger and Other Tales
Sagging Meniscus Press
$18

All three books available from Small Press Distribution, 1341 Seventh Street, Berkeley, CA 94710-1409, 510-524-1668, www.spdbooks.org.

Grief Songs CD available only from the author: Jack Foley, 2569 Maxwell Avenue, Oakland, CA 94601, jandafoley_at_sbcglobal_dot_net.





Our instinct should not be to desire consolation over a loss but rather to develop a deep and painful curiosity to explore this loss completely, to experience the peculiarity, the singularity, and the effects of this loss in our life.

…but death is rooted so deeply in the essence of love (if we only shared in this knowledge of death, without being deterred by the ugliness and suspicions that have been attached to it) that it nowhere contradicts love.

I am sure that the content of “initiations” had never been anything but the communication of a “key” that allowed us to read the word “death” without negation; just like the moon, life surely has a side that is perpetually turned away from us and which is not its opposite but adds to its perfection and completeness, to the truly intact and full sphere of being.

Rilke, Rainer Maria. The Poet's Guide to Life: The Wisdom of Rilke (Random House Publishing Group. Kindle Edition).


On June 27, 2016 Adelle Foley died from complications related to stomach cancer. She and Jack had been married for more than 50 years. For most of that time they had performed together as poets. Anyone that saw or heard them perform found the experience transformative. The combination of voices, sometimes in unison, sometimes interwoven as call and response, sometimes reading different lines simultaneously made an impression that was impossible to dismiss.

In Adelle’s absence Jack was left alone even more profoundly than the terrible, sudden aloneness from which all suffer who lose a loved one. How was he to continue? “‘Grief,’” he writes, “for me seems to be a sort of nervous breakdown in which the forces of life and death play themselves out in the most intense fashion.”

The books that he has published since Adelle’s death contain some material that was written over the course of many years and some that was written in direct response to her passing. All of it, however, in some way reflects the intensity of an absence whose presence is death. It is the end of one state and a complete insistence upon something other – an undetermined no-thing-ness.

While death is certainly nothing new to poetry, indeed, it is one of its essential components, no other contemporary poet has responded is a manner resembling what Foley has composed and published. It is unflinching in its directness. It includes a wide variety of voices - as we have grown to expect and love in Foley’s poetry - but here many other living voices are included, as they too responded to Adelle’s absence. All of it is masterfully woven into a open field of poetry that directs the reader through the melancholic harrowing of the soul that death demands of the living.

Grief Songs was composed almost entirely after Adelle’s death and the pieces that weren’t relate directly to Adelle’s illness and passing. A CD is also available that includes Foley’s performances of pieces from the book and an interview with Adelle about her poetry.

Like much of Foley’s work, Grief Songs is a kind of collage, a collection of voices that work together to create a whole that defies the very notion of singularity and the convention of a poet finding his or her voice. Poems, letters, memories, journal excepts, photos and even one of the cartoons that Jack and Adelle drew for one another many years ago are combined to create a volume that is unlike any other response to death.

This is not a surprise to anyone who knows Jack Foley’s work. He is a poet of more voices that even he probably knows. One of the differences in this particular volume is that some of the voices included are the voices of friends. The flood of lamentation and consolation demonstrate beautifully the deep and enduring connection Jack and Adelle made over the years. Read as part of this collection they are voices in a great chorus that addresses death as a phenomenon beyond our reckoning. Yet, we must confront it repeatedly assimilate it into life. That assimilation is the process we witness in this book.

There are so many powerful pieces and they are so varied that it is impossible to accurately convey the experience of the book in a few words. But one of the most compelling is a poem Jack wrote shortly before Adelle’s death. It is called “Viriditas” — a concept used most effectively by Hildegard von Bingen. It is translated as “greening power” and is associated with the divine power of life when it overwhelms our human limitations. Here are a few excerpts:

Viriditas —
the dream
of a green
world

we are
light
coming to consciousness
of
itself
men & women
of light

what is mind
but light?
what is body?

Kora–the seed
above ground–under–
the need
to follow her–down the rabbit hole
following the
idea
of resurrection–
seed-

greenness, love:
as you lie in this moment
of danger,
as you sleep
wondering if the next sleep
will be death,
“this greeny flower,”
this green
comes to you
the power of life
Viriditas

The connection that immediately leaps out at us is the reference to William Carlos Williams who wrote “Asphodel, That Greeny Flower” late in life as well as a volume of “improvisations” called Kora in Hell dedicated to his wife, Flossie. However, Foley’s greeny flower is “this” flower not “that.” Perhaps Adelle’s illness - “as you lie in this moment/ of danger” - made that greening power more immediate. Death was suddenly, terribly present. Adelle’s entire being was caught in the tension of it and as with so much of their life together, Jack was participating. In Kora in Hell, Williams writes:
Between two contending forces there may at all times arrive that moment
when the stress is equal on both sides so that with a great pushing a great
stability results giving a picture of perfect rest. And so it may be that once
upon the way the end drives back upon the beginning and a stoppage will
occur. At such a time the poet shrinks from the doom that is calling him
forgetting the delicate rhythms of perfect beauty, preferring in his mind the
gross buffetings of good and evil fortune.
The “gross buffetings of good and evil fortune” may well describe what is happening with Foley in this poem and throughout Grief Songs. “we are/ light/ coming to consciousness/ of /itself,” Foley writes, but the consciousness that is arriving in the moment of the poem is the full flowering of life on the brink of extinction. It is an unbearable tension with the end driving back upon the beginning. If mind is light, what is body? Do they work in opposition to one another? Does viriditas, the greening power, drive on through death as the seed planted in the dark ground dies and is resurrected to a new life, a new creature? Here is Williams from the early lines of “Asphodel…”:
I come, my sweet,
to sing to you.
We lived long together
a life filled,
if you will,
with flowers. So that
I was cheered
when I came first to know
that there were flowers also
in hell.
Jack and Adelle lived long together — a life filled with love, joy, and the massive tensions of creativity. As he writes in “For Adelle”:
How do you mourn the absence of someone you’ve seen almost every day of your
life and whose daily presence was always a comfort to you?
What Jack seems to be discovering in the crucial, dark turning of Adelle’s life is the power that lies at the center of that complex phenomenon: Jack was sitting beside Adelle as she slept in a momentary reprieve from the illness that was destroying her body. Poetry was the only possible response. He was writing/singing to Adelle while she slept, bringing life to her, poetry, bringing the dark beauty of the flowers that live in the hell she was suffering. When Adelle woke, he read the poem to her. That experience of viriditas courses through the entirety of Grief Songs regardless of who is speaking. Despite the finality of death the song continues. Grief itself is a song. Mourning is a kind of music. It bridges the chasm and voices the absence, resurrects the life that has departed. It is a celebration in melancholy of an arrival. In Rilke’s words, “life surely has a side that is perpetually turned away from us and which is not its opposite but adds to its perfection and completeness, to the truly intact and full sphere of being.”

How can the brutality of death add to the perfection and completeness of life? Is life so insignificant relative to that other, the life that was, that we are unable to comprehend its appearance? We are thrown into a paradox that, try as we might, we are unable to resolve. Instead, no matter how we might refuse it, we continue to live.

In a letter to his doctor Foley writes:
…writing is in fact my main source of comfort, but it is a powerful and
deeply engaging source of comfort; I can pour my love and my grief into it,
and there is room left over…

I have been experiencing deep grief but I’m not sure I’m exactly “coming out”
of it. It’s possible that you don’t come out of grief: rather, that grief enters
into you, becomes a part of your history
.
(my emphasis)
and on another page this single line in italics:
You exist now in vivid absence.
We do not overcome death and the sorrow it imposes, we learn it. We integrate its impenetrable darkness and accept it as a companion. It is not the companion we chose, nor does it choose us. It projects its existence into the field of “vivid absence.” As much as we may invent the persona of that absence and sketch out its details it remains as unavailable to us as the living person it replaced. Adelle’s clothes still hang in the closet, her robe remains where she left it the day she went to the hospital. Jack clings to these things even though friends advise him to send them away, to “Good Will.” Death has come and gone, but so many aspects of Adelle’s life remain present. Why should Jack send these things away?

One often hears following the death of a loved one that what is required is closure. How do you close a life that refuses to die inside you, that is a fundamental aspect of yourself? If death has opened a vast chasm in your life would it not be more realistic to submit to the openness it has created rather than try to close one’s life to it? As Foley says, “grief enters into you, becomes a part of your history.” You carry the open wound and embrace it just as surely as you embraced the loved one whose death created the wound. Death does not demand closure, it profoundly insists that we remain open. Is this Rilke’s “perfection and completeness?” Perhaps. It is certainly something more than being alone, being lone, a singular self. No poet has demonstrated more eloquently in his work and in his life that we are not singular entities than Jack Foley. Grief Songs provides abundant evidence of this truth. He is everywhere accompanied by others – inside by way of memory and imagination and outside by a chorus of friends, family and colleagues and they all are given voice in this book.

The book closes with “Yahrzeit” — a poem written to commemorate the first anniversary of Adelle’s death. Yahrzeit is the ancient Jewish tradition of burning a candle and reciting the Mourner’s Kaddish — a prayer or hymn of praise. It is a fitting way to end a book that can never be entirely closed just as a life can never be entirely sealed away by death. We are made not only by the life we live, but by the life of others we love and that life and love never passes away. Here are the final lines of the poem:
How we formed each other
How we treasured each other’s hearts.
If the stories are true,
You may be in bliss
While I find my way through this quivering wall of sorrow
and tears
And love.
My first love, my dear first love.
It has been a year
(Has it been a year?),
Yahrzeit.

Your ashes
Remain&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in the vanishing morning light.

Grief songs is a “quivering wall of sorrow and tears.” But it is also a document of persistence despite terrible anguish, of life in the body of death.

*

As anyone familiar with James Joyce will recognize, Riverrun takes its title from the first word of Finnegans Wake.
riverrun past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay
And like that extraordinary book, Riverrun is playful, musical and endlessly inventive. Its mood is almost buoyantly creative despite the fact that it culminates in the deep sorrow and the greening power of viriditas, the name of the poem that appears very near the beginning of Grief Songs.

One of the most fascinating sections in Riverrun is a sequence called DITTIES, most of which is written in scripto continua, a form of writing that does not include spaces, punctuation or any other division in the text. It was the norm for classical Greek and Latin. In both cases the text was usually written entirely in capital letters. Foley has found an excellent use for the form as most of the work appears to be stream of consciousness or something close to it. Here are the opening lines of “DITTIES 5”:
BEESDISTANTLYHUMMINGMICEATTHEIRWORKINTHEATTICSSOMESLIMETRACKSMADEB
YTHEHOMEOPATHICSLUGTHEEARTHWORMHAPPYANDSAFEFROMTHEBIRD’SBEAKPORK
CH0PSONAPLATEAWAITINGTHEKNIFEMOHAIRFORTHEE
We not only read the words Foley had in mind when he wrote them, but we find other words that we would not discover with contemporary conventional text. It also deceives our eyes into seeing letters that aren’t actually there and new words forming in combination with the actual letters. We find ourselves seduced into collaborating with the poet in secondary and “invisible” poems set to his music. For example, one might discover in “bees distantly humming mice at their work in the attics” additional words like ant, ice, or, and eat. Or we might be “deceived” into seeing or adding words like hide, strum, murmur or pork. Out of one poem three poems develop. This does not suggest that the initial poem isn’t engaging enough as it stands, but the secondary and invisible poems happen as a spontaneous result of reading the original. The process returns us to the kind of enchantment that children experience with language and always lies at the heart of all poetry that retains open content and musicality. The “DITTIES” also remind us of the problems inherent with text passing from one person to the next as we read, copy, interpret and translate. One wonders just how often the earliest texts of Plato, Ovid or the New Testament might have been unintentionally or creatively misread. Though written language provides enormous benefits as opposed to orality alone, it also generates new problems (consider the “creativity” of the auto-correct on your computer or phone).

The use of scripto continua is yet another example of what Foley has been doing with poetry for 50 years. By using text and voice in unconventional modes, and creating a few modes all his own, he reinvigorates what it means to read and hear poetry. Once again it is alive and vital, and frequently risky.

In recent years Foley has also employed a technique called “writing between the lines” which began when he wrote his own lines into lines written by other poets. The technique asks us to read two poems simultaneously or at least to read one poem then return and read the second poem and then think and feel what they mean together. In the following except from “Damascus” Foley is the author of all the lines, but it is quite obvious that at least two poems are happening in the same space:

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Last year at Damascus the sun
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp The man
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Shone for part of a day
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Raised the gun to his
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp And then moodily disappeared
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Temple
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Clouds gathered
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp But couldn’t pull—

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp People moved
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp And shopped
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Died of fright they said


The two interwoven poems are made all the more interesting because at times they seem to complete or at least enhance one another. The sun shone for part of a day last year in Damascus, but it is also possible that the incident with the man happened last year in Damascus. It is difficult not to read it that way. Also of interest in this space of double tongued poetry is the word that is absent - trigger - the part of the gun that could not be used is not used in the poem. Yet, without its presence the man would not have died of fright nor would the poem contain the menace it has for us; a menace that is amplified by the gathering clouds. And yet, people moved and shopped. Life went on as normal. And why shouldn’t it? The people in the poem may have nothing to do with the man with the gun in the poem interposed between the lines. Considering what has happened in Damascus in recent years the poem also takes on the contexts of metaphor and social realism and forces us to ask the question, how much of reality do we miss as we go about our daily business? And how suddenly can that ignored reality be imposed upon us as the lines that we assume divide prove to be nonexistent - like that non-existent trigger that must have been there?

Riverrun represents the latest version of the kind of book that Foley has published for decades. Enormously intelligent, musical, playful, profound and abundant in the multiplicity of the selves that appear and disappear. We recognize many of those selves, but we have never witnessed them in these contexts. Like the whole of Foley’s work, it is accessible even though it is experimental and utterly authentic even at its most familiar. In an endnote he writes:
These poems have the pull of the other—Spicer’s spooks or Martians—drawing
me into them. They derive, like a river, and change like a river, and insist on their
oddities.
*

While The Tiger and Other Tales is very recognizable as the work of Jack Foley it is his first book composed primarily of stories. Some of the stories are written as dialog and as plays, and some of the stories incorporate poetry, but they are stories all the same. Anyone that has attended a Jack Foley performance, or is at all familiar with his books, knows that he is fond of telling stories, but here we experience more completely his art within the form of prose narrative. To be sure, it is frequently a very unconventional narrative, the work of a poet writing not what he knows, but writing to discover, to bring the unknown to light. That mode of discovery is an essential element of the book’s magic. As readers we are carried along into those unexpected turns where things happen that we “know” are impossible. This is not fantasy writing, or speculative fiction, it is inspired narrative from sources that lie outside the author’s own devising. We get the sense that what we read was not written so much as allowed to happen. These tales are not the result of careful workshop methodology, but works of wonder and mystery where certain truths occur, but are never entirely revealed. If they have an intention it is to unsettle us from the familiar and cast us into open spaces where boundaries are blurred and exposed as mere convention.

It is also a “collected stories” in the sense that they were not written in a single period. The earliest of these was written in the 80s and the latest as recently as the mid 2010s. Can we perceive a development of style across the years, a maturing? Perhaps, but not in the way one might read developments in the average short story collection. This may be in part because the pieces do not appear in chronological order; they are assembled to create something like a whole, albeit a whole that is never attributable to any single approach to the written word. But more than that, Foley’s work always refuses to be contained or categorized. The stories are too diverse to be adequately described in a review, but here are a few examples:

“Broughton Fountain” captures all the delight and magic of the great poet, filmmaker and visionary James Broughton. Foley doesn’t imitate Broughton’s style so much as he captures his spirit in a fable that is wildly playful, as joyous as Broughton himself, yet it is profound, even redemptive. A master who happens to be named James Broughton is surprised by a disciple who willingly tosses himself off a cliff, even before the master can find a pencil to record his name to make sure he is not forgotten. No matter, the disciple soon returns. What follows is an “avalanche” that changes everything for the master and his students.

“The Ern Malley Story” recalls how two young soldiers in Australia during WW2 conspired to challenge modernism. The results were unexpected and hilarious. Even in the written text the story has an informality that reads as if it were dictated rather than a carefully composed piece. Yet that is precisely what it is — and it mirrors the conspiracy and the poetry it generated. The story raises questions as well, about the nature of modernism, what it is or was, and how even now it unsettles its audience. Is it sometimes intentionally a charade at its own expense? Even more now than when the story was written modernism is being challenged. The story suggests that this is not necessarily a bad thing, but those who offer the challenge frequently come away with reputations diminished while modernism remains.

“‘The Monst’” is something of a child’s story that develops into an examination of the slippery nature of identity and how identity works in the social context of family and community. How much of what believe about the personalities that interact in these contexts is fictional? Does it have any ground in reality at all? Reality itself is a bit slippery in this story as well. Utilizing the childlike narrative Foley poses broad existential questions. This in turn invites inquiries about the assumptions we make about childhood and maturity. Yet, the “The Monst” never ceases to be light and humorous.

In “An E-mail to George” the protagonist, Jack, is suffering from the sudden death of his brother. In an attempt to console him a friend tells Jack of a website where people can send emails to the dead. Dubious, Jack sends his brother an email. To his astonishment he receives a reply. The drama that follows not only calls our traditional assumptions of an afterlife into question, it strikes at the assumptions we bring with us into any “real” circumstance. How real is identity, the ego? How real is the person, any person with whom we communicate electronically? What kind of reality is it? Certainly not physical. We see, and sometimes hear, traces of that person, but he or she is never entirely present for us in the way that humans have always experienced presence. Even handwritten correspondence summons most of our senses. It is a trace only once removed from the actual person. But electronic communication would have seemed ghostly to our ancestors. Yet we “know” that it is real. It is as real as consciousness. But how real is that? The last word of the story lands like a hammer in the brain.

These are only four examples chosen almost at random. And yet they do what Foley’s work always does, they drive us toward transformation. They place us in various kinds of tensions between extremes, between inclinations, prejudices, cultural and personal assumptions. Foley frequently quotes Rilke’s “The Archaic Torso of Apollo,” the closing sentence of which is “You must change your life.” And like the deity summoned for Rilke in the broken statue, Jack Foley’s work makes demands upon us that we do not frequently experience in art — even great art. Although it frequently entertains and enlightens it takes a further step. It insists that we do not remain where we were before we encountered the work. It insists that we do not remain who we were. It requires transformation. The Latin is transformer — across or beyond + to form. It requires that we move beyond our present form or at least into another version of the same form. It strikes at the very impulse toward form and pattern that is fundamental to human experience. This is cognitive dissonance as high (and low) art and something more — it is motion, a powerful shift beneath the foundations of experience.

Foley’s father was a vaudevillian — a song and dance man. He made his living on the stage and was quite successful. His son takes that occupation several steps beyond itself. He is still a singer and a dancer, but his stage is consciousness itself. And though his audience frequently and enthusiastically applaud, it also ceases to be what it was before the performance began. Each member of the audience moves into an other space where imagination alone determines who and what they are and will become. What more can art do than summon and transform being itself? That is precisely what Foley’s work does. That is the shifting terrain he has mastered with extraordinary success.
we are
light
coming to consciousness
of
itself


10.19.17



Jake Berry
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 1

$
0
0
Daniel de Culla






























Daniel de Culla (1955) is a writer, poet, and photographer. He is also a member of the Spanish Writers Association, Director of the Gallo Tricolor Review, and Robespierre Review. He moves between North Hollywood, Madrid and Burgos, Spain.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 5

$
0
0
Robert Gauldie


Otolith Ear-Stones: Reading the Runes

Otoliths are real things. Did you know that? We humans have otoliths in our inner ears. Did you even know that we had inner ears? That is how we can hear our inner thoughts. Not really. Just joking. Our otoliths are among the oldest parts of our human bodies. They are true avatars. They are the part of ourselves that even still, today, relives the strange beginnings of animal life at a distance of half-a-billion years ago.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Animal simply means the awakening of the anima: Latin for the breath of life. Anima impellunt lintea Thraciae was the proverbial North Wind whose cold breath could sway even a Thracian. But why wind? Anima, the wind, was something that had force and direction. It went to somewhere from somewhere. This is the meaning of animal life: something that can marshal its forces to go in a particular direction. How can you go in a particular direction unless you know where you came from? Wriggling about might change your position, but it is hardly to be thought of as moving in a particular direction. Therefore, to go somewhere intentionally is to leave somewhere intentionally, and, then, to go in a particular direction. This was our first act of knowing. This was our first personal freedom; the freedom to choose our own direction. The first otoliths were devices that our forebears created that allowed a choice of direction. To choose my own direction we use as a metaphor for what we consider our most basic human rights: freedom of speech, freedom of movement, and freedom of religion. Yet in it’s most literal, physiological sense, to choose my own direction dates right back to the beginning of animal life.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  The simplest otoliths are still around. They are called rhopalia. They are tiny little crystals in cells around the umbrella of the jellyfishes. The rhopalia are balanced on a tiny mat of sensitive hair cells. Gravity, ever-present gravity, means that when the umbrella of the jellyfish and its cells tilt, then the force of gravity on the hair cells will make the hair cells bend in a different direction. There you have it. A few bending-sensitive hair cells and a bit of crystal, add gravity, and even a jellyfish knows up from down. It is behaviourally aware that the directions up, down and sideways exist. It has anima. It is now an animal.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  A half-a-billion year ago puts us in the Cambrian era. The strange creatures of the Cambrian are the oldest known directional animals, the oldest known movers in a certain controllable direction. The jellyfishes are probably older, but their equivalent of the otolith, the rhopalia, proved to be a dead-end. It has been successful enough to survive for more than 500 million years, but does not provide a sufficiently flexible tool that can go past knowing up from down. So the jellyfish was doomed long ago to a slow pulsating existence, knowing up from down, aware of direction but not how to control direction.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Way, way back in the in the early Cambrian, long before the fishes as we know them, the rocks have preserved the remains of Haikouichthys. Not just as a single rare fossil, but over five hundred specimens of Haikouichthys have been found. We are now talking something like 550 million years ago when most of the animals around were so strange that they have been given names like Hallucinogenia. For many of these strange animals we are still unsure how all their separate fossilised parts fit together. The various combinations are so strange that all appear equally unlikely to our eyes. But Haikouichthys is to all intents and purposes a little vertebrate; surprisingly similar to what we might imagine the first little fish to look like. But this is right at the beginning, before molluscs, before the crustaceans, before the worms, before even the spider-relatives, aeons before the insects. Here at the very outset of life is a little vertebrate. I have cribbed the image of Haikouichthys from the Palaeos website. As you can see from the descriptive text on the Haikouichthys image, it has all the characteristics of a vertebrate, including paired otic capsules, inner ears! They are paired, as we might expect from the forerunners of our own ears. Located close to the primitive brain, this is the first step towards hearing. Although we do not know how their paired ears worked, we know that the vertebrate otic apparatus knows up from down, as pairs they know left from right, and situated at the anterior of the fish, they know front from back. These are animals that can move in a certain direction. It is here that we see the appearance of our first freedom: the freedom to choose our own direction.


&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Between Haikouichthys and the true fishes the otolith story takes a side turn. Here we encounter another little creature that looks like Haikouichthys, but differs fundamentally. Here is a little creature that echoes Sherlock Holmes’ dog that did not bark. It is the vertebrate that did not hear. We encounter these little deaf vertebrates in the Cambrian era some 20 million years after Haikouichthys makes its dramatic appearance. Pikaia and Haikouella certainly look like the cousins of Haikouichthys except that they show no evidence at all of an otic apparatus. They have no ears. The close cousins of these little creatures are still with us today. Branchiostoma, sometimes called Amphioxus, is virtually identical to Pikaia and Haikouella and still has no ears. In quiet sandy parts of bays and inlets of seas all around the world Branchiostoma can exist in huge numbers. They are shy and elusive. All but invisible, the sand-lancets as they are commonly named, slither in and out of the sand like pale transparent leaves; gone in an instant. Perhaps it is not surprising that they are still with us today. Perhaps, like the jellyfish, they stayed with the successful form of the moment, giving up the chance to evolve in return for longevity in a mute, silent world. Content with their own small advance, they changed no more. But how do they know front from back, up from down, with not even a simple gravity detector like that of the jellyfishes? The sand-lancets have eyes. Perhaps they have organised their vision to replace the ear functions. Perhaps in doing so they sacrificed the flexibility of having ears both and eyes for stability. And stable they have remained for five hundred million years, albeit deaf, and with eyesight impaired by its double function.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  From Haikouichthys we come by strange ways, mostly still unknown to us, to the early fishes. But fish so strange we never have seen their like. Only their bones remain. But in their long-fossilised bones we can see that a great knowing has taken place. They have what we can recognise as proper fish ears. As far back as four hundred million years we can see from a cast of the inside of the skull of Kiaeraspis, an early jawless fish, that there is already a capsule for the otolith as well as the semicircular canals that the vertebrates use for tracking their angular velocity. The orbits show little Kiaeraspis (the skull is a few centimetres across) had well-developed eyes. The innervated semi-circular structures around the left and right hand edges of the skull may have been direct pressure wave detectors or perhaps voltage-sensitive electric organs. The vestibule (i.e. the otic capsule) and the orbits for the eyes are fairly large. Coupled with the pressure wave detectors and/or electric organs, this little fish was as well, or better, equipped to detect danger and prey than a modern bony fish. Many fishes still retain the electrical telepathy capability that may have been present in Kiaeraspis. Can they read each other’s thoughts? Do they have thoughts to read? Kiaeraspis certainly did not have much of a brain compared to the modern true fishes. Kiaeraspis may be comparable to modern robots that can have exquisitely sensitive sensory systems but cannot think at all.


&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  What was once a little crystal disturbed by gravity in the jellyfishes is now in the early jawless fishes a more complex calcium carbonate structure tossed about by the ever-changing skeins of pressure waves in the sea. They can hear sound. The fish can hear. What do they hear? Is it only fear that impels them? &nbsp&nbsp  Danger? &nbsp&nbsp Food? &nbsp&nbsp Do fishes hear friendship in the sounds of their schooling numbers? Do they hear beauty? Perhaps it is best that we do not know. It is no comfort to the eaters to know the thoughts of the eaten.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  From the fishes to us, the ear-story is well known; how we part company with the fish, firstly to the primitive amphibians and then to the first mammals. Yes. The amphibians lead to the proto-mammals, not lizards or other reptiles, but proto-mammals. The oldest animals to follow the amphibians were the Therapsids, remarkably mammal-like creatures. These mammal-like forms that lead to the true mammals also lead to the dinosaurs. The early mammals were somewhat eclipsed by the telegenic dinosaurs. Just how much they were eclipsed is hard to tell. The fossil record keeps changing with mammals that are very similar to modern mammals now reaching back into the early Cretaceous. While dinosaurs thrived in the long arid period of the late Permian, Triassic, Jurassic and early Cretaceous, the mammal like animals and the true mammals were still there. The arid conditions that favoured the egg-laying habits of the dinosaurs may have also made preservation of the mammal bones unlikely. As climate conditions shifted to cooler and wetter with more rapid cyclical weather patterns, the flowering plants outpaced the older fern, pine, palm and cycad vegetation. So the tables turned on the dinosaurs in favour of the mammal-like animals and eventually the true mammals.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  The great asteroid extinction of the dinosaurs makes great theatre. It is tailor-made for television, that great promoter of least effort ideas. It has become, along with global warming, one of the great dei ex machina of our age. But the whole history of geology has been one long battle between the gradualists and the evolutionists on one side, and the catastrophists and the saltists on the other side. In the history of geology, there is nothing new in the battle between science and the various evocations of the hand of God. As science, the asteroid idea is as full of holes as big as the one the asteroid is supposed to have made. Even as theology the great asteroid extinction hardly measures up to Genesis.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  The lungfish, amphibians and sharks stayed with the oldest kind of otolith, the one that we humans still keep, a sticky agglomerate of small crystals more or less shaped in a certain way laying on a similarly shaped bed of hair cells. The fishes, ever conservative, have opted for a shift sideways, converting the sticky agglomerate into a single rigid calcium carbonate crystal, sometimes centimetres across that would make the bending of the hair cells more controllable. But the amphibian ancestors of the mammals, ever the innovators, went for a radical change. The sound waves would bend the membrane on which the hair cells grew. It was an extraordinary choice by chance that took us from hearing noises to listening to sounds From listening to sounds it is only a small step to distinguishing speech, to perceiving meaning. When the frogs call and the wolves howl, make no mistake, their meaning is clear to those who listen. Anima became for us not just the direction of the sound waves on wind and sea, but also the directions of the meanings of the sound waves themselves. We can choose the direction in which our minds go. This is our second fundamental freedom: the freedom to choose the direction of our own thoughts.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  But what about our otoliths? Ah. Our ancient avatar. Yes, we still keep it for its ancient use. It just tells us up from down and no more, neither left from right nor back from front. It is the part of us doomed to a slow pulsating existence. Try spinning around and around. It is your otoliths that make you dizzy, that make you flop around like a jellyfish.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Well. Is that it? Have we come to the end of our aliquot of freedoms? No. We have already started on the third freedom. This is the freedom to understand the direction of the nature of life itself. To understand the nature of something is to understand how it works: to understand its mechanics, its physics, its chemistry. With that understanding comes control. We change things because we know how they work. Our knowledge of how the genetics of rice works means that we can keep hundreds of millions of people from hunger. How many Beethovens, how many Marie Curies, how many Nelson Mandelas has our knowledge of rice genetics kept from starvation? What will happen as we increase our knowledge of life itself? No more deaths from cancer sounds like a good idea. But, of course, no more deaths from cancer means that we have the potential for no more death at all. The bad news, however, is that our aberrant, highly-organised bodies must obey the laws of thermodynamics. The more complex we are the more likely we are to break down. What we call old age is simple the by-product of the frictional load on our complex bodies. Death, to which we ascribe such powerful emotional connotations, is simply poor engineering design. Can we overcome such poor engineering? Can we overcome the irrational fear of even trying to overcome such poor engineering?
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Think about the otolith. The jellyfish still lumbers along sufficient in its primitive otolith to meet it own small ends. But the better otolith engineering of Haikouichthys provided a sense of direction, and so came the freedom to move in a chosen direction. Still better otolith engineering gave us the power to perceive the directions of thought that are in inherent in the ability to hear words, not just sounds. If the jellyfish could think, they would no doubt consider the fish impious in their use of direction instead of sticking with stability. Fish, if they could think, would view us with contempt as mere flibbertigibbets who dart around endlessly chasing thoughts instead of sticking to reliable directions. Just as the jellyfish and the fishes, we also shall think them blasphemous who dare to interfere with human genetics and re-engineer ourselves to not just accommodate new directions of thought, but the new direction of life itself.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  The otolith story provides signposts along the route that the real creation process has taken to make the dust of the earth into such a strange multi-layer cake that we call man. A layer of jellyfish here, there a bit of fish, another layer of amphibian and still more laid down between Cynodonts and Creodonts; then many jumps to the Dryopithecine apes and somewhere, ill-defined, we appear. Some of the ancient genes we may well keep but nearly all of it has been re-treaded many times until we have the shape of the past, the ghost in the shell, but everything is really new. What, then, is the bit that is truly us? We are the shadows squeezed in between the many layers: the formless meanings are who we are. Just as we squeeze our words into poems to make them mean that formless something that lies in shadow between the letters and the lines, so the us of us is squeezed between the layers and the bits of animals that we once were.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  We are too well-used to the idea that we are somehow unique and special, and unchanging. We see our selves as a separate incident to the animals around us that we farm and eat and keep to amuse ourselves. We quite like the idea that we are a special act of God; even if we deride creationists for being too literal. When we try to modify the genes of ourselves and other animals, there is always a rush of public concern that we are meddling with something outside our ken; that we are meddling in things that only the Gods can do. Our hubris will destroy us. It is only natural to find this reaction from believers in religions of creation. But it comes as a shock to find this reaction in societies that are as permeated, as utterly drenched, with science and technology as we are in the Western Judaeo-Christian culture. After all, if it were not for science and technology two thirds of us would be already dead!
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Perhaps there is a general rule here that guides our destiny. Change only occurs when something does not survive. Change is the true death, and the true life. Unchanging means that there will be no re-birth, but that longevity is paid for by un-change. The jellyfish, the sand-lancets, the fish, the meat-mammals and the apes are with us still; but still in their un-changed old form. The part of them that is us has changed, but still remains the same. In some distant time there may still be people just like us. Perhaps they will be friends, we hope, with the “others”, the new people, who will abide our clumsy selves and pity us, as we the apes do pity. And build for us reserves wherein we can farm and play, build and fight, and be content in our human manner still using our earlier-model animal parts, our ear stones included, in the ancient way. We will still rejoice in our Bach and Beethoven, Shakespeare and Elliot; but the “others”, what will they hear? Is there music truly in the stars? Are there thoughts that stretch beyond the distant boundary of our isolated Universe? What hidden meanings will they contrive among the letters and lines of their speech and their poems? What great knowing that is denied to us will there be among the “others’?
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Speaking for myself, I am tired of being part-jellyfish, part-fish, part-amphibian, part–meat-mammal. I am ready for re-engineering. Oh. I forgot to mention. The lesson from the real world of evolutionary re-engineering is that last in the queue is first of the menu; just as the jellyfish, fishes, amphibians and meat-mammals have found out. Think about that next time someone talks to you about banning genetic engineering. Of course, the GMO humans of the future are not likely to eat you. Untermenschen will be far too useful to the “others” to waste as food.




 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 4

$
0
0
Robert Gauldie


EURYDICE

&nbsp&nbsp I


A hateful journey,
Stony underfoot,
The horses stumbling so often,
We had to walk
Mile after mile into those accursed hills.
I argued with him.
Reasoned, ranted, reminded
Him of all the other women,
The songs, the feasts,
Joy, hope desire; anything
To make him change.
Hopeless. Love is madness,
To be sure, that makes the mad
Yet madder still.
He was never one for sense.
Even at the last moment
I cursed him in his folly
Begged him not to go,
But he went, singing like a nightingale
Into the twists and turns of that dark-greened gaping hole.

I waited, sleepless.
At night it stinks; you cannot
Risk to sleep so near the dead.
At night, especially, surrounded
By cypress, cunning-cruel,
That would steal your mind.
I feared for the horses,
Kept them hobbled
And sat sword-drawn
In the darkness.
God knows what use a sword against the dead.

In the dawn he returned,
His eyes stricken,
His face as grey as ashes
And his harp silent.
I looked for marks upon him
To see if some dark evil
Had bitten him; to suck his blood
Or worse, to leave him lingering
Like one half-dead among the living,
So, it is said, the dead have their revenge.


The horses, thank the Gods,
Bore us away swiftly,
Sure-footed in their desire
To retreat from that dark hole.

I wanted to go west,
By the low road,
To find taverns; wine, wine,
I was as dry
As any wooden God.
But no; the only words he spoke
Were to take the high road.
It was a madness, surely,
But I was weary, and him so strange.
We passed by Cadmus' grave
And there the thought struck me
He had been cursed,
That we should turn and run,
But it was too late.
The lateness of the hour
Had darkened the road
And all those naked women,
Howling sluts, pigs-cunts,
Just fell upon him, some even with their teeth
Splattering each other with his blood
Laughing and yelling,
Rubbing their bloodied tits at me
Shouting and yelling, a fuck, a fuck,
a greek fuck.
I turned and rode away.

Now I live here.
There are no women in this house.
My brother has four sons,
And I three dogs,
Rough hounds from Macedonia,
Whose three great slavering heads
Keep strangers from my gate.
As if those stupid superstitious louts
Would ever dare the door of Polydorus,
Who, in their own rumour,
Stood at the gate of hell.
Little do they know.


&nbsp&nbsp II


It was evening, with birds far-away singing,
And shadows deepening the hills,
Marking that greater dark against the darkness.
Polydorus, glum, watched silent the stringing of the lute.
Only his eyes saying don't go. It's madness,
Folly, to sacrifice a mind for a woman dead.
God knows, how many loose-hipped women
Polydorus knew and valued far below a friend.

I was convinced. That hard-eyed bitch at Delphis
Never lied; for all her treachery and fucking-up with
Total strangers. God knows how, in Apollo's sacred name
She always spoke the truth across the altar.
Costly it might be, but true; whether that she-bitch or you
Might ever wish it otherwise.
So it was, that one hand should send shivering
A glittering cascade of notes, lightening the cypresses,
And staying the moaning dog against the door.

I had expected heat: flames and pain unbearable.
But it was nothing like that.
All around me there were whispers: begging, pleading, pleading,
"Please, please, believe me. What I say is true, true, true."
Far and near, the insistent desperation of the dead
Struggling to touch me across the music's shimmering guard,
Struggling to suck me, devour me, from cock to forelock,
Desperate to take a living life to live again.
"Oh, please, please, believe me." Oh, the horror of those
Endless, lying, lifeless, rotting, desperate, dying liar’s lives.

I can't remember how it ended. Leaving? Standing?
Looking back? One last, long, lingering look
And then through that agonising hole back into life,
With Polydorus crying; weeping on my shoulder
Saddling for that long, bitter, ride to Thebes.


&nbsp&nbsp III


His face so longed-for
And the lingering caress of his eyes,
Awakening long-forgotten memories.
Desire in the green and sunshine,
Summer: scent-laden and already bowed
With the reddening ripeness of coming fruit.
His hands, warming to touch
Amongst those cold grey shades,
Stirring the pulse of love.
His voice calling, Orpheus' song, the silver flow
Of rain and water in that waterless stone world.

But all around the pressing dead shudder;
Newly awakened with fear, their eyes begging,
Weeping tearless tears for me to stay, stay
Stay safe among the shades,
Life's cruel torments dimmed by Lethe's anodyne.
Stopping their ears against Orpheus' song, the carmine flow
Reeking of blood and death in this scentless, deathless, cold stone world.

With all these catching at my heart, I followed,
Until at last, that long, last, lingering look;
His eyes filling with love and fear, life and death,
Desire and dependency.
And so I chose to stay,
Returning with those faceless faces
To a life already lived and loved.
All pains forgotten, all sins absolved.


&nbsp&nbsp IV


My uncle Polydorus
Lived here, with us, beside the sea.
Here, with his three beloved dogs,
Swimming in the sea,
Every day.
I never knew a man so obsessed
With cleanliness, always washing his hands,
His face, even his silly dogs.

Some say he was embittered,
Paying out his time, waiting to die;
But I never saw it.
I only remember him laughing
Every day.
I never knew a man so funny
Always finding humour all around him,
Even at his own expense.

He avoided women,
That much is true: it was love,
He said. He loved them overmuch.
A man's love is a woman's weapon,
He said.
Soon they will dominate you,
Break your will, lead you into quiet acceptance.
Old loves must die before they can love anew,
And so it goes.


&nbsp&nbsp V: CAFE POLYDORUS


Polydorus, famous cook,
Cheesemaker, vintner,
Turning sweetmeats and grape leaves
Into spicy delectations in the clutter
Of firewood, water pots, broken stones
And dried-out scraps littering
The path to flyblown privy.

He watches the road,
His house a vantage point,
A red and rocky hill above the sea,
Enough for cooling airs and view caerulean
Shimmering molten into the setting sun.

Maricella twirls her fork,
Delicately. Her dainty lips nibble pasta
Her eyes across the wine glass
Pooled with desire
Reflecting the slow, dark evening's
Languorous, slumberous turns.

He watches the road,
And waits, perspiring at his task, observant ever
Among the wineblown laughter of his guests
His mind half-absent turning eastward,
Waiting, patient.

Marcantonio strums,
Singing,
Rolling all his flabby cheeks
And sentimental belly
Into soaring declamations of celestial delights
Of love undying.
Stops abruptly.
Scratches, sucks noisily a glowing golden strega.

He watches the road,
Where creaking sign brings travelers to weary halt
Beside the tumbling hedgerows, polyglot flowers,
Plangent profusion across the narrow neck
From waspy grapes to dusty road.
Moon shadows pass across his hands,
And stars creep furtively across the sky,
But nothing sleeps. The flowers watch,
Leaves touching in the shadows,
Still, redolent; languid perfumes pass
Across each other's path and fill the air
With messages and sighs.


&nbsp&nbsp VI: PUDENDA


Esme's mother Sibyl, born in Cumea,
Appollonius her father, a taxi driver in Piraeus
Working from dawn to dusk.
Esme loves to fuck.
Finding boyfriends in the wine bars
By the Church of Saint Anselm the Paraclete
Providing blessing between her legs
For penitential pence and chocolates.

Sibyl's hair is black.
She never ages; passing all that time
With cards, turning prophecies from jacks and queens.
Mr. Tibererio smiles;
Admires his slicked back hair, never sees
His dried out dugs and dowagers hump.
Rouged, he winks at sailors
Below the walls at Thebes
Throbbing with trucks, trams and roaring motorbikes.

Discoroides plays the flute
Clustering notes like the birds of Tereu,
Nightingales singing sweetly, sifted through the clatter
Of knives and forks; Esme's sister Thetis
Serves souvlaki and chips, dodging boots and dogs
With slender feet, silvering her pocket with smiles.
Mr. Syrinx works the kitchen, never speaking;
Excepting Wednesdays, when, pythaic,
He dictates the menu,
Forecasting order amongst the breadsticks and dusty retsinas,
Turning Tuesday's circumstances into profit.




 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 3

$
0
0
kari edwards

explicit

I wake up asleep, now
coming below
the Mason-Dixon line
stranger than strange
on a subterranean mass transient
calling language
the language line
committing, omitting, submitting
my collective guilt for all sins
or whatever it is called
the bridge not finished
that usual warehouse feel
everything beige
can not tell the difference
from wawa shade grown
holiday spas
or where I go to get my
breakfast burrito like everyone else
classless prepackaged
and not like those
debt hieroglyphs
scrap heap politician
burrowing in production
painting metaphors
for prewar
shallow creeks
with mercury poisoning
abandoned to loading docks
door prize
all well meaning
track homes



but I must live live, though I have died twice

Personal acts of resistance are the words I wanted to use. Turn the
flesh inside out, ripped apart to remains, damp clods of earth, laid
well away from the overworked, well groomed furniture store's breeding
multiples. Let immovable resolve implode on bended knees while the
millions sharpen their hearing of slaughter and decay gets covered by
the fattened crust of neglect. Hear the fertile black silence mourn
the dead. Know there is no trumpeting finally, only the struggle to
remember to struggle, discarding the utopian ideal, that died begging
for release on placebos alter ego's altar, begging for respect in the
symbolic horizon's florescent glow.





 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 2

$
0
0
Marthe Reed


Hybrid Flora
















 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 1

$
0
0
Ira Cohen


For Ingeborg Bachmann

Speaking of kisses
that have slipped
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp away
now no matter how
hard I look
I cannot find the words
which describe their
disappearance
like a taste in the
mouth recalled but
not remembered
Only the tongue
of a beautiful
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  woman
can tell you of the
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  mystery
of forgotten kisses.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  June 30, 2006



God’s Bounty

My heart is a drum
which keeps beating
in a rhythm which makes
me crazy. The phone
&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  rings
& I don’t recognize the
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  caller
I am receiving deliveries
I never ordered
Hafiz tells me that
this is God’s bounty
If we knew everything
before it happened
would we ever seek the
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  unknown
or discover how to lose ourselves
in clouds of confusion?
Still fear comes unbidden
while we wait endlessly
for what will never come
Through the window of
your heart you can see
both within & without
I’m going back to bed.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  March 30, 2006



(untitled)

Dreams of turbaned singers
droning the sounds of the
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Universe
in deep voices
buried up to their necks
in sand. I am looking from
above on an illusory parapet
Suddenly I want my camera
but it isn’t with me.
Marina says I went to Abaton,
the first of the imaginary places
My blood sugar keeps climbing,
even in sleep. When I wake
I think of death & take a shot
of insulin before breakfast.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  June 25, 2006




 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 7

$
0
0
Jack Foley


CLASSICAL JAZZ

do we sing to the deaf
non canimus surdis
the woods
answer all
respondent omnia silvae
all the woods come to our call
shepherds on the hill
piping our rural sounds
here in the West
respondent omnia silvae
we do not sing to the deaf
the woods
echo all
the redwoods the oaks the eucalyptus the pines the palms
non canimus surdis; respondent omnia silvae *

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp * From Virgil’s Tenth Eclogue: “we do not sing to the deaf; the woods answer everything.”



FABLES


Sleep well.

Dream well.

Dream of wells.

Dream of water.

Dream of bells.

On water.

Bells.

*

AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE,

the door,
which had been stuck,
sprang open.

*

Radical.

Blind.

Dream of.

Hold.

Enigma.

Enigmatic.

Riposte.


*

I would say
I love you
But the bells
Drowned out
My voice



RIFF RAFF
Madly the archer bent his bow. She answered, I’m not in pain I’m in Philadelphia. The last man out the door closes the door, as we all close the door. In Pennsylvania no one thinks of the woods. Beauty is its own double feature. When the screen darkens, the lights in the house come on. The man with the gun turned the corner before opening the door. He smiled. I saw the flicker on the edge of the building just as the sun went down. When the gods fail you know there is a naked woman waltzing out the window.


DUET WITH MYSELF

The function of memory
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  My name is Jack
is to soften the blow of death
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  I was born
to create the illusion of a self
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  far away
though it is also memory
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  on the east coast
that creates
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  of america
the fear of death
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in a city near the roaring sea

This is the function
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  I live
of memory:
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  now
to soften
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in the far, far west
the blow of death
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  near
to create
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  the roaring
the illusion
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  of another
of self
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  sea



GATE, GATE, PARAGATE, PARASAMGATE, BODHI SVAHAA! *

Going, going, going on beyond
Always going on beyond,
Always becoming Buddha
Going, going,
Going on beyond,
Beyond this beyond
The
Always going on beyond
Always becoming
Buddha
In the dark of our lives
This song
Awakens life
Awakens me to longing
A longing song that rises
In the heart of the morning in the sudden flush of love for Sangye
As I see the Buddha (Sangye)
Not as a person but as a possibility
As the never ending
Always beginning
Always going on
Beyond
Arising in my heart in the deep ground
Of being



shadows move across my table
old age does not mean
difficulty with thought
(though names may disappear)
old age is to be ravaged
by memory, people alive once,
no longer yet
present in the mind (from this
the notion of ghosts?)
people who can no longer answer
but whose words stay lodged
in the web-filled smoky attic of your
busy consciousness and at times
if they were dear
bring tears
and thoughts of the strangeness of death
that something that was
could cease absolutely
and without recourse
of any kind—no longer “there”
shadows move constantly in the room
against the wall
at this time of day
at this moment
this closed particularity
in the vast river we call
years
years

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp * Mantra from The Heart Sutra. Variously translated. One: “Gone, Gone, Gone beyond Gone utterly beyond. O what an awakening.”



FOR SANGYE

Lady,
with your face in the light,
Lady of light,
blessed by the sun,
prayer flag whirling before you
blue of deep night
you stand smiling
as colors gather around you
Sangye
at a height of love
Sangye
dreaming of benefit
to all sentient beings



RANT, AFTER FLORIDA

How do we mourn for children
How do we mourn for these defenseless ones
How do we cry out against
A future cut off at the root
We call it senseless and look for reasons
Blame the victims blame the authorities
Blame everything except the true cause
Which lies all around you as plain as day
In every television show in every news story
In every comic book in every political statement
In every action hero in every piece
Of parental guidance in every song in rap
Hip hop pop old movies all university syllabi books
Talk shows in every assassination and
Every assassination attempt in the National
Rifle Association in any political party left
Right or center in every attempt to better the situation
In capitalism in socialism in radical in conservative
In the banks in auto dealerships in my mother’s
Complaints about my behavior in prisons in freedom
In the latest movie about love in Christianity in Judaism in Islam in Buddhism
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp in the KKK in the Young Men’s Christian
Association in the collision of all these things
In the consciousness of a young man paralyzed
In his need for action and self assertion and who can see
No possibility of action other than the annihilation of
Everything and everyone he sees so that a new heaven
And a new earth may be born so that the new may be
Announced and the old may perish and himself
The sacrificial instrument—the Christ—through which
These long-desired things may be accomplished.
.

How do we mourn
The culture the values the world
That makes all this
A possibility.

&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  [for two voices, spoken as a round]



FROM DITTIES: POEMS IN SCRIPTIO CONTINUA

AIRPLANESZOOMINGFROMOAKLANDTONOWHEREFROMOAKLANDTOEVER
YWHEREFROMNORTHERNCALIFTOTHEDEEPDEEPSOUTHFRIENDSSIGHING
ANDFRYINGINTHEHEATINTHESKILLETSINTHELARRUPIN’SOUTH

LANGUAGE/SOUNDPLACESACONTEXTABURDENOFMEANINGUPONUSTHEM
OMENTTHESPEAKEROFTHEWAKEBEGINSTOTALK(“the night was clear
though i slept i seen
it”)HISWORLDAWAKENSAWALKERINHISWORLDTHETONGUETHELINGUATH
EOLDPALAVERTHEFIRE(“none will loc but the wind will cum” )“THEWAECEND”

HOTSEPTEMBERDAYSGIVINGMENEWSOFLIMITATIONSLAPSESOFENERGYIN
THEHEATLOVEFORTHEHOUSEFAN

IWRITEANDDOWHATICAN.ITINTERESTSME,KEEPSMEALIVE.BUTIHAVENORE
ASONTOBELIEVETHATAFTERMYDEATHANYONEWILLCAREABOUTMYWRITIN
G.IT’SEXTREMELYDIFFICULTTOKNOWWHATWRITINGWILLLASTANDWHATW
ILLNOTBUTIHAVENOINDICATIONSTHATMINEWILLLAST.MYENTHUSIASMSH
AVEBEENINTENSEANDIHAVETRIEDTOEMBODYTHEM—
EMBODYWHATITHINK
BUTTHEREAREVERYFEWPEOPLEWHOADMIREMYWORKANDIBELIEVEIKNOW
THEMALL!THISDOESNOTINDICATETHEPOSSIBILITYOFLASTINGFAMEORINFL
UENCE.I’MALLRIGHTWITHTHIS:IT’SJUSTTHEWAYTHINGSARE.IDIDMYBEST.

THEBATWASISOLATEDINTHELIVINGROOM.THEYHANGONDRAPESWHENTHE
YDON’TMOVESOTHEYAREN’TALLTHATHARDTOLOCATE.IHADCLOSEDTHEGLA
SSDOORS.THEFRONTDOORWASOPEN.THEBATWASMOTIONLESSONTHELIVIN
GROOMRUG.ICAREFULLYWENTROUNDTOTHEFRONTROOMTOCLOSETHEDOO
RSOITCOULDN’TGETBACKTHERE.IMAYHAVESEENITJUSTASITEXITEDTHEFRO
NTDOOR.THEYLOOKLIKESHADOWSWHENTHEYFLYBY.



BLINDNESS & INSIGHT

There are things we don’t know
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  There are things we don’t know
about what we know
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  about what we know
There is an element
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  There is an element
of ignorance in the midst of our deepest gnosis
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  of ignorance in the midst of our deepest gnosis
Woody Guthrie, obsessed
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Woody Guthrie, obsessed
by Lead Belly’s song, “Goodnight, Irene”—
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  by Lead Belly’s song, “Goodnight, Irene”—
and no doubt by Lead Belly—
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  and no doubt by Lead Belly—
reproduced that tune
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  reproduced that tune
in a number of his own compositions:
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in a number of his own compositions:
he didn’t know
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  he didn’t know
until someone told him,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  until someone told him,
“Woody, you done it again”
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  “Woody, you done it again”
A friend, a deeply self-aware poet,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  A friend, a deeply self-aware poet,
wrote “dark” into almost all his poems
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  wrote “dark” into almost all his poems
until he was made aware of it
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  until he was made aware of it
What word is he repeating now?
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  What word is he repeating now?
Another poet friend
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Another poet friend
is obsessed by “blue”
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  is obsessed by “blue”
which appears
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  which appears
more than any other color word
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  more than any other color word
in her work
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in her work
Is it the color of the Virgin Mary
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Is it the color of the Virgin Mary
the sky
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  the sky
the “blues”?
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  the “blues”?
Half-noticing perhaps
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  Half-noticing perhaps
she titled an entire section of her book,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  she titled an entire section of her book,
“Pink”
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  “Pink”
There are these words
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  These are the words
that haunt us—“haints”—
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  that haunt us—“haints”—
no matter what we write
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  no matter what we write
no matter the subject
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  no matter the subject
If we could read them
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  If we could read them
we might know ourselves
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  we might know ourselves
as others know us
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  as others know us
but all we do
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  but all we do
is write them down
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  is write them down
“Blindness and Insight,”
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  “Blindness and Insight,”
wrote Paul de Man
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  wrote Paul de Man
in a marvelous moment
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  in a marvelous moment
of blind insight
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  of blind insight
What did he fail to see when he saw
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  What did he fail to see when he saw
the negative element
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  the negative element
at the center
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  at the center
of consciousness
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  of consciousness
the black hole
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  the black hole
which captures light
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  which captures light
but will not
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  but will not
set it
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  set it
free
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  free



FOR MY LATE WIFE, ADELLE: ANOTHER YAHRZEIT

Dear companion of my heart,
It has been two years since
You have been in the world,
Now in the nowhere
Of endless memory
Spinning a web of nothing new.
How often I speak to you
To the you that was and is no more
How often I go back to the nothing
Of the life we shared for fifty-five years
The life no longer there
And I wish I could tell you, dear ghost,
Of the new things in my life,
Of the lovely woman who shares my bed
And my heart—though you will never be
Undone or forgotten, not after fifty-five years,
Jamais je ne t’oublierai—
Though the happy smile
In the photographs says,
Not now, not ever again, not
Ever again.
Ma chère,
Je veux que tout le monde se souvienne de toi.
Two years.
Can all that history—that burden— &nbsp  be gone?
Dear, dear ghost,
It saddens me beyond measure
That you will never see
The publication of your much-loved son’s
Second, hard-won, born-of-struggle book:
How often we listened to him tell
Of the immense difficulties in the production of that book.
I think it will gain him, at last, much praise and fame.



When someone as dear, as tangled in my life as you dies
One wishes to feel that
Not everything is gone
And so one clings
To objects
That carry spirit.
My love, Sangye,
Might say, from a Buddhist point of view,
This is only “attachment”
And perhaps should be renounced.
She may be right.
But I tell her,

Life is a sword that kills
And gifts the living
With an endless&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  shadow



If I could believe
That your spirit
Lives on
I would rejoice
Boundlessly
But—as you knew—
I always found
The Bible’s great definition of faith,
“The substance of things hoped for,
The evidence of things not seen,”
To be a definition of wish, of fiction
Of, at its extreme, delusion
So I remain
An irreligious man
A man of the darkness
Whose only light
Lies in this world,
Where you came
And cared for me
And loved me
And vanished with the wind.




Jack Foley has published 15 books of poetry, 5 books of criticism, a book of stories, and a two-volume, 3,000-page “chronoencyclopedia,” Visions & Affiliations: California Poetry 1940-2005. He became well known through his multi-voiced performances with his late wife, Adelle, who was also a poet; many of these performances are on YouTube. His selected poems, EYES, appeared from Poetry Hotel Press in 2013. His most recent books are The Tiger & Other Tales, a book of stories, sketches and two plays; Riverrun, a book of poetry, mostly experimental; and Grief Songs, a book documenting his grief at the death of his wife, Adelle. He currently performs with his new life partner, Sangye Land. Since 1988 he has presented poetry on Berkeley radio station KPFA. In 2010 he received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Berkeley Poetry Festival, and June 5, 2010 was declared “Jack Foley Day” in Berkeley.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 6

$
0
0
Clara B. Jones


Lobster Sonnet

1a. You are a poet who likes Lobster Thermidor.
1b. There are two types of people: gourmands and cat-lovers, but, thanks to Shemika, it's hard to trust
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp chefs.

2. Stand up for your rights since your father is cruel and your mother has an I.Q. of 75.

3a. Wilderness maps could slow global warming:https://www.wilderness.net/nwps/maps
3b. Furthermore, negroes pair caviar and eel.

4. You were a revolutionary in Chad, but now you are living the American dream.

5a. What is the difference between human and Afrobot?
5b. Afrobots are simulacra.
5c. Is Poetry a simulacrum of life?

6. Michelle left Barack and ran off with a Cyborg.

7a. Mexicans like tacos but would rather eat herring.
7b. Yes, but you are a negro who never eats okra.

8a. Women smoke menthols and spray mint perfume.
8b. On the other hand, they want tech jobs.

9a. Shemika traded a litre of Merlot for a bag of chips.
9b. Her cat was hungry.

10a. Shemika is a vegan.
10b. Everything in moderation.
10c. ...split peas, onion, natural flavors, starch, potato, carrot, yeast extracts, sea salt, garlic, parsley,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp lemon peel, spices, citric acid [made in a facility that uses peanuts and other food allergens]...

11a. Are you obsessive-compulsive?
11b. No. My life is chaotic. “Chance favors the prepared mind,” but mine is in disarray.

12. Negroes pair eel and Merlot.

13a. I have a degree in cybersecurity but would rather earn a living as a line cook.
13b. What is holding you back?
13c. I'm allergic to the smell of olive oil, and my mother texts me constantly.
13d. Cybersecurity pays well, and you could move to Boston.
13e. I am sensitive to cold air and am not Catholic.
13f. You are a negro and might like Atlanta.
13g. I am looking for a different demographic.
13h. You should consider Miami.
13i. Gay men are moving to Osaka.

14. C'est ça.




Clara B. Jones practices poetry in Silver Spring, MD (USA). She, also, conducts research on experimental poetry and radical publishing. Clara is author of four chapbooks and one volume (/feminine nature/, 2017, Gauss PDF), and her poetry, reviews, essays, and interviews have appeared, or are forthcoming, in various venues.
 
 
previous page&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp contents&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp next page
 

Article 5

Viewing all 5242 articles
Browse latest View live